To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
In this video presentation, Disputes Partner Anushka Sharda
explains the background of the case, the outcome and discusses the
significance of BITs in light of the Cairn Tax Dispute.
The content of this document do not necessarily reflect the
views/position of Khaitan & Co but remain solely those of the
author(s). For any further queries or follow up please contact
Khaitan & Co at legalalerts@khaitanco.com
In a recent judgement, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the matter of S.V. Samudram vs. State of Karnataka & Another, set aside an order and judgment dated 07.02.2017 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
On January 10, 2024, the Supreme Court of India in the case of, Alagammal v. Ganesan, held that specific performance of an agreement to sell cannot be sought by a buyer ...
The Delhi High Court recently in the case of, Vingro Developers Private Limited v. Nitya Shree Developers Private Limited, (Arb. P. 667/2023), has held that directors of a company cannot be made party...
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act') was enacted to consolidate and amend the law governing Domestic Arbitration, International Commercial...
The United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation , otherwise known as the ‘Singapore Convention', defines ‘Mediation' as ...
A recent survey conducted by our firm provides valuable insights into the current state of domestic arbitration in India from the perspective of those directly involved, rather than from legal professionals.
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.